<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Archive.org &#8211; When the past comes back to haunt you</title>
	<atom:link href="http://acro.net/blog/2009/02/03/archiveorg-when-the-past-comes-back-to-haunt-you/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://acro.net/blog/domains/archiveorg-when-the-past-comes-back-to-haunt-you/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 20:27:55 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Magnate</title>
		<link>http://acro.net/blog/domains/archiveorg-when-the-past-comes-back-to-haunt-you/comment-page-1/#comment-2040</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Magnate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 08:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acro.net/blog/2009/02/03/archiveorg-when-the-past-comes-back-to-haunt-you/#comment-2040</guid>
		<description>Interesting story, I think demanding all their revenues as damage fees is a bit extreme.

Archive.org is an excellent research tool. I wonder if there is a way to get your unwanted archive.org entries removed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting story, I think demanding all their revenues as damage fees is a bit extreme.</p>
<p>Archive.org is an excellent research tool. I wonder if there is a way to get your unwanted archive.org entries removed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Reberry</title>
		<link>http://acro.net/blog/domains/archiveorg-when-the-past-comes-back-to-haunt-you/comment-page-1/#comment-1999</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Reberry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 04:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acro.net/blog/2009/02/03/archiveorg-when-the-past-comes-back-to-haunt-you/#comment-1999</guid>
		<description>quote: &quot;The initial lawsuit was filed on June 26, 2003, and they added the robots.txt file on July 8, 2003, so pages should have been removed retroactively.&quot;

Interesting.  That would be a very interesting case to hear.  Though I would guess if robots.txt did not exist at the time, there is nothing they were doing to protect it.  Who knows though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>quote: &#8220;The initial lawsuit was filed on June 26, 2003, and they added the robots.txt file on July 8, 2003, so pages should have been removed retroactively.&#8221;</p>
<p>Interesting.  That would be a very interesting case to hear.  Though I would guess if robots.txt did not exist at the time, there is nothing they were doing to protect it.  Who knows though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

