<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Higher .com/.net fees? Big whoopie!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://acro.net/blog/2009/12/17/higher-com-net-fees-big-whoopie/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://acro.net/blog/domains/higher-com-net-fees-big-whoopie/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 20:27:55 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Acro</title>
		<link>http://acro.net/blog/domains/higher-com-net-fees-big-whoopie/comment-page-1/#comment-8708</link>
		<dc:creator>Acro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 22:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acro.net/blog/?p=263#comment-8708</guid>
		<description>Welcome to the real world, kid, where things have a price tag. As for being a sucker - I already pass the cost of renewing my domains to the American taxpayer :D So it doesn&#039;t matter if they go up 50 cents or 5 dollars a piece, it&#039;s a business expense to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to the real world, kid, where things have a price tag. As for being a sucker &#8211; I already pass the cost of renewing my domains to the American taxpayer <img src='http://acro.net/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' />  So it doesn&#8217;t matter if they go up 50 cents or 5 dollars a piece, it&#8217;s a business expense to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Belmassio</title>
		<link>http://acro.net/blog/domains/higher-com-net-fees-big-whoopie/comment-page-1/#comment-8682</link>
		<dc:creator>Belmassio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 18:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acro.net/blog/?p=263#comment-8682</guid>
		<description>You just made my point.  Registrations were free.  So why the rise in price?  There is no need. It&#039;s been proven many times that the registries can run for a couple, three dollars.

If you like being sucker than more power to you....but not me. I&#039;ll always fight any price raise above where we are now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You just made my point.  Registrations were free.  So why the rise in price?  There is no need. It&#8217;s been proven many times that the registries can run for a couple, three dollars.</p>
<p>If you like being sucker than more power to you&#8230;.but not me. I&#8217;ll always fight any price raise above where we are now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Acro</title>
		<link>http://acro.net/blog/domains/higher-com-net-fees-big-whoopie/comment-page-1/#comment-8653</link>
		<dc:creator>Acro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 04:46:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acro.net/blog/?p=263#comment-8653</guid>
		<description>And before that, registrations were free, so what is your point? 
The argument is not about monopolies but whether the 50 cent price increase is a serious matter to lose sleep over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And before that, registrations were free, so what is your point?<br />
The argument is not about monopolies but whether the 50 cent price increase is a serious matter to lose sleep over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Belmassio</title>
		<link>http://acro.net/blog/domains/higher-com-net-fees-big-whoopie/comment-page-1/#comment-8651</link>
		<dc:creator>Belmassio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 03:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acro.net/blog/?p=263#comment-8651</guid>
		<description>To those domainers with a short memory a judge ruled in 1997 that $15 of that $50 fee was an &quot;illegal tax&quot; brought to you courtesy of a government sanctioned monopoly.

It&#039;s the same dirty situation today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To those domainers with a short memory a judge ruled in 1997 that $15 of that $50 fee was an &#8220;illegal tax&#8221; brought to you courtesy of a government sanctioned monopoly.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the same dirty situation today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

