<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Domains, Taxes and Fabulous.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://acro.net/blog/2010/03/24/domains-taxes-and-fabulous-com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://acro.net/blog/domains/domains-taxes-and-fabulous-com/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 20:27:55 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Acro</title>
		<link>http://acro.net/blog/domains/domains-taxes-and-fabulous-com/comment-page-1/#comment-11991</link>
		<dc:creator>Acro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 20:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acro.net/blog/?p=379#comment-11991</guid>
		<description>Good to hear others having a great experience with Fabulous.com :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to hear others having a great experience with Fabulous.com <img src='http://acro.net/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Flanders</title>
		<link>http://acro.net/blog/domains/domains-taxes-and-fabulous-com/comment-page-1/#comment-11982</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Flanders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 13:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acro.net/blog/?p=379#comment-11982</guid>
		<description>Well said Acro! I couldn&#039;t agree more- on both Fabulous and... ugh, enom. Richard, if you&#039;re out there, someone must go over and kick some ass at enom.

Roy Flanders</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said Acro! I couldn&#8217;t agree more- on both Fabulous and&#8230; ugh, enom. Richard, if you&#8217;re out there, someone must go over and kick some ass at enom.</p>
<p>Roy Flanders</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://acro.net/blog/domains/domains-taxes-and-fabulous-com/comment-page-1/#comment-11977</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 11:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acro.net/blog/?p=379#comment-11977</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s why they are called Fabulous !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s why they are called Fabulous !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christine</title>
		<link>http://acro.net/blog/domains/domains-taxes-and-fabulous-com/comment-page-1/#comment-11969</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 06:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acro.net/blog/?p=379#comment-11969</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been consolidating at Moniker for most of the same reasons. Some of the best known registrars have the crappiest mass-management options. Based on your criteria and mine, I&#039;d say that Moniker and Fabulous are two registrars that take the needs of large portfolio holders seriously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been consolidating at Moniker for most of the same reasons. Some of the best known registrars have the crappiest mass-management options. Based on your criteria and mine, I&#8217;d say that Moniker and Fabulous are two registrars that take the needs of large portfolio holders seriously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

