Dot .CO madness: What domains did I spend my money on?
Since the .CO Registry opened up its gates ten days ago, more than 370,000 .CO domains have been registered.
Initial concern over the long-term visibility of .co domains was calmed down by Google’s reassuring statement that .co domains will be given equal treatment among .com, .net, .org and the various other TLDs and ccTLDs.
A lot of domain investors went after generics – keywords that retain their strength regardless of how exotic the TLD might be; the added bonus, in this case, being the relation to .com and potentially typo-traffic. Some domain investors, like Mike Mann, went after super-generics, such as Oil.co, Gas.co and Gold.co
Others foolishly registered blatant trademarks of existing .com domains – an example is Papajohns.co
Personally, I decided to limit my .CO acquisitions to geoDomains.
I went after a small group of domains that had the following characteristics: the .com was either undeveloped and parked, or its developed status was so antiquated as if we were stuck in 1995. In total, I invested in about 50 .co domains with the intention to develop and not park. It’s the first such group registration that I’ve performed with a strategic plan in mind.
Elliot Silver’s experiment with Bahamas.co shows that several other domain investors had similar ideas in mind. I’m just glad I did not compete with those; essentially, the niche market I went after was wide open and I’m happy with my domain acquisitions.
In the coming weeks a development strategy will be put in place; the .co TLD offers plenty of opportunities for search engine ranking and visibility, simply because the .com guys are sitting on their parked domains and virtual laurels for too long.
A developed .co domain with a matching keyword will outrank a parked .com any day.
