In my very early days as a domainer, not having much feedback or guidance from experienced professionals, I thought it was cool that I had registered the .com of an existing company that for some odd reason chose to use the .net
So nonchalantly, I did the obvious: contacted them and offered it for sale. The only problem: the exact term was a registered trademark.
The company president responded that he could barely afford the trademark, let alone pay for the .com at open market prices. The story ended there, the .net was eventually dropped and the trademark died.
Ten years later, I still own the .com but I learned a useful lesson.
Namejet auctions off unpaid domains registered with Network Solutions, eNom and a couple of other registrars. In doing so, domains that were registered in the early days of the Internet are being released into a public bidding which then turns private. Several worthy domains are being auctioned daily; some have traffic or a history – having belonged to companies until their recent past.
A lot of these domains are byproducts of mergers, acquisitions or corporate dissolutions. Quite a few are the result of expirations due to broken emails, forgotten passwords or neglect.
What’s even more alarming is the amount of trademark domains that are entered into the public and private auctions, daily. Literally dozens of aged, quality domains that when checked against a single database – that of the USPTO – can be found in a multitude of formats.
From my observations, many domains that have expired have trademark applications that are pending a decision or were recently applied for. Regardless of their obvious status, several domainers – some of which would be considered “repeat offenders” – are bidding serious chunks of money that far exceed the safety figure of a UDRP cost.
Also, companies that have pending trademarks are actively pursuing these domains at the drop, by bidding against domainers and although they are prepared to pay a premium price for them, should not be confused with easy recipients of a domain flip.
A small number of individuals that habitually catch these domains at Namejet auctions, act with the intention to resell them to trademark holders. A particularly notorious one is actually sending out letters of intent to these companies, informing them that he will be able to bid on their behalf against “cybersquatters” – clearly, the epitome of a weasel scum domainer.
Simply because you can chase after trademark domains, don’t do it. The risk well outweighs the benefits.
Good article and point mate.
iD
The other thing you need to be careful of is overseas trademarks.
This issue is hightened by the “complaints driven systems” belonging to ccTLD’s. For example, I recently picked up a domain on the drop and had parked it for about 4 months only to receive a written letter from the entity that handles the ccTLD (not a UDRP or even an email). Apparently an overseas company complained and although there was no trademark or entity using that name in Australia (in my case), they put my domain name back into Pending Delete!
I decided that it wasn’t worth the time or energy to argue this and moved on.
I am in a similar situation at the moment. I actually beat halvarez at SnapNames for this domain, which I later found out GE has a trademark for, GE does not seem to care, someone else owns the .net, but since mine is the .com, I don’t know if I should develop it. Any advice?
Hi
Interested to hear about the Australian experience. We register trademarks in Australia and I’m not sure they can revert the domain back into pending delete.
Just remember also that trademarks are registered for particular goods and services. If you have a domain name and use it for something completely different, that’s not trademark infringement.